Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Ochar v. Neighbors Bank
as 1:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Wilson Ochar
Defendant:
Neighbors Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Samuel Whatley v. Richland County Family Court, Columbia, SC
as 23-1449
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHLAND COUNTY FAMILY COURT COLUMBIA SOUTH CAROLINA, PHOEBE WHATLEY, MONET S. PINCUS, Family Court Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cecile Lescs v. City of Winchester
as 22-1093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CECILE M. LESCS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WINCHESTER, ANIMAL WARDEN LIANG, ANIMAL WARDEN SLONAKER and others
Defendant:
KEVIN SANZENBACHER, Former Chief of Police, LIEUTENANT BAUSERMAN, MR. HESS and others
Spruill v. Paris et al
as 2:2021cv00574
Plaintiff:
Thomas S. Spruill
Defendant:
Sgt. Paris, Lt. Harvey, Cpl Midgette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villanueva v. Municipality of the State of Alaska, et al
as 3:2021cv00146
Defendant:
General Attorney's Office, Brother Francis Shelter, Rick Mitcham and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos A Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siles v. Stolle et al
as 1:2019cv01537
Defendant:
N. Ingrams, Sgt. Saucier, Dr. Jay and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Siles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Royal Neighbors of America A Fraternal Benefit Society
as 6:2019cv02675
Defendant:
Royal Neighbors of America A Fraternal Benefit Society
Plaintiff:
Thelma Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lescs v. City of Winchester et al
as 5:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Ltn Bauserman, Eden Freeman, Animal Warden Liang and others
Plaintiff:
Cecile M. Lescs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
