Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hatton v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Maryann Hatton
Defendant:
United States of America
Harrison et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03299
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Harrison, William Patrick Flores, John Alan Fluck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Vazquez v. Trantham et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Hugo Fabian Pinacho Vazquez
Defendant:
Patrick Elijah Trantham, Chip Hall, Sylva Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vazquez v. Trantham et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Hugo Fabian Pinacho Vazquez
Defendant:
Patrick Elijah Trantham, Chris Hatton, Chip Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv03306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Babstock et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv02473
Plaintiff:
John Babstock, Michael Clinton, Marcelino Correa and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kinard v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01077
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Keaston D. Kinard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mast v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01074
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Mast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01076
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Emonte A. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01075
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Daiquan L. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
