Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Adams v. Moore et al
as 7:2021cv00392
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Paul Moore, Susan Stallard, M. Broyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Media Break Away, LLC v. Qiuhaiji
as 1:2015cv00970
Plaintiff:
Media Break Away, LLC
Defendant:
Qiuhaiji and HI.NET
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Breaks et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv21634
Plaintiff:
Brenda Breaks and Ronald Breaks
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marra et al v. Breaks et al
as 2:2012cv06675
Plaintiff:
Catherine M. Marra and Allison Marra
Defendant:
Debra M. Breaks and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Coffee Break Services, Inc. et al v. Compass Group USA, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01077
Plaintiff:
Coffee Break Services, Inc. and Steven T Sapperstein
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DIRECTV Inc v. Turner et al
as 8:2009cv01689
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV Inc
Defendant:
Jeffrey W Turner, Steven H Smith and Break Time Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
James Latham, Jr. v. Gene Johnson
as 08-7673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BENNETT LATHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board, FRED SHILLING, Director of Health Services, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
EMI April Music, Inc. et al v. Accessible Enterprises, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
EMI April Music, Inc., Notting Dale Songs, Inc., Tarpo Music Publishing and others
Defendant:
Accessible Enterprises, LLC, Fred Welch and Minichiello G. Hunter
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
