Cases 1 - 10 of 237
Vazquez v. Norwood et al
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Samuel Cedeno Vazquez
Defendant:
Norwood, Moreno and Holloman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Moreno Colindres v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1533
Petitioner:
JUAN ANTONIO MORENO COLINDRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Archer v. Saunder et al
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Susan Michelle Archer
Defendant:
NP Saunder, Nurse Rose and DR Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Moreno v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Ciro Moreno
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Mike Meyers, Gary Elbert Adamson, John Edward Aguilar and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Jai King v. A. Boyd
as 23-7200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAI ALQUAN KING
Defendant / Appellee:
AMANDA BOYD, HSA Supervisor, DR. DALE MORENO, LIEUTENANT MONTRELL BEASLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
