Cases 1 - 10 of 371
Respess et al v. VMI Alumni Association
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William L. Respess, Dean Barr, Hugh P. Brien and others
Defendant:
VMI Alumni Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowe v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01569
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Rowe
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Family Dollar Stores of Maryland, LLC and Dollar Tree, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Singletary v. Stirling et al
as 9:2024cv03132
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel A. Singletary
Defendant:
Brian P. Stirling, Jana Hollis, Stephen Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Case Opened in Error
as 5:2024hc02079
Defendant:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holtzinger v. Rowe
as 1:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Defendant:
Craig Rowe, Todd Faith, Melissa Lookabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Heather Rowe
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Holtzinger v. Rowe
as 1:2024cv00788
Petitioner:
Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Respondent:
Major Craig Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Clerk of Courts et al
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Larry Hamilton, Jr., Larry Hamilton Bey, Jr. and Tusk
Defendant:
Clerk of Courts, State of Maryland, Agent #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe v. Build Design Center LLC
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Leigh Ann Rowe
Defendant:
Build Design Center LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
