Cases 1 - 10 of 1,514
Teat v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01468
Plaintiff:
William Aaron Teat, Sr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Knights of Columbus, Council 694 v. National Park Service et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Knights of Columbus, Council 694
Defendant:
National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Aaron Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00797
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Geneva Enterprises, LLC et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Geneva Enterprises, LLC and AV Automotive, LLC
Defendant:
Aaron Chavez, Alex Guevara, Ana Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Richards v. Exxon Mobile et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Christopher Richards
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil, A Corporation, Danny Long and Aaron Pina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fleenor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Aaron Fleenor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Freeman v. Cross et al
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Lavonne Maurice Freeman
Defendant:
Aaron Cross, D. Mears, W. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson Specialty Insurance Company v. Dean et al
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Hudson Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mark Hormuz Dean, D.O., Osteopathic Physicians of Charlottesville, Ltd., Osteopathic Surgical Centers, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
