Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Luis Flores-Bacigalupo v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1804
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO FLORES-BACIGALUPO, a/k/a Luis Alberto Flores
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
United States of America v. $175,000 in United States Currency
as 4:2022cv01570
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$175,000 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Ely Nestarez, Jaime Valdivia, First American Land Trust Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
San Jose Restaurant, Inc. v. Laura Pontones
as 19-445
Petitioner:
SAN JOSE OF ROANOKE RAPIDS, INC., SAN JOSE MEXICAN RESAURANT OF ELIZABETHTOWN, INC., EDGAR FLORES and others
Respondent:
LAURA PONTONES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Luis Flores v. William Barr
as 19-1366
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO FLORES
Pontones v. San Jose Restaurant, Incorporated et al
as 5:2018cv00219
Plaintiff:
Laura Pontones
Defendant:
San Jose Restaurant, Incorporated, San Jose Management, Inc, San Jose Mexican Restaurant #2 of Lumberton, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arellano Galvan, et al v. San Jose Mexican Restaurant of NC, Inc., et al
as 7:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Arellano Galvan , Jose Alfredo Avila Torres and Rafael Aaron Brito Martinez
Defendant:
San Jose Mexican Restaurant of NC, Inc., San Jose Mexican Restaurant #2 of Lumberton, Inc., San Jose Mexican Restaurant of Pembroke, NC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
DELGADO v. PERRY
as 1:2014cv00323
Petitioner:
ALBERTO FLORES DELGADO
Respondent:
FRANK L. PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez-Ramos et al v. Donna
as 1:2009cv00541
Plaintiff:
Carlos Manuel Ramirez-Ramos, Francisco Alberto Flores, Jorge Armando Guerrero-Valiente and others
Defendant:
Roberto Donna
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
