Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bascom v. Fiduciary Trust Company International We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00007
Plaintiff: Ellen Bascom
Defendant: Fiduciary Trust Company International, Trustee of the Article Seven Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Anita G. Zucker, Trustee of the Anita G. Zucker Trust et al v. Bowl America, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01967
Plaintiff: Anita G. Zucker, Trustee of the Anita G. Zucker Trust, Anita G. Zucker, Trustee of the Article 6 Marital Trust, Under the First Amended and Restated Jerry Zucker Revocable Trust, Anita G. Zucker, Trustee of the Anita G. Zucker Trust Dated April 4, 2007, as Subsequently Amended or Restated and others
Defendant: Bowl America, Inc., Bowlero Corp., Duff & Phelps Securities LLC and others
Banks v. Trump Articles of Impeachment Incitment of Insurrection at U.S. Capitol et al
as 1:2021cv00158
Defendant: Warden Sekou Maat, Central Intelligence Agency, Designation and Sentence Computation Center and others
Petitioner: Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. 269 Acres Located in Beaufort
as 20-1281
Defendant / Appellant: 269 ACRES LOCATED IN BEAUFORT COUNTY, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, More or Less, SARAH T. BURRUS, as Trustee of the Sarah T. Burrus Trust under Article Nine of the William D. Trask Revocable Trust dated February 17, 2000, MARGARET SCHEPER TRASK and others
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and BEAUFORT COUNTY ASSESSOR
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. 269 Acres Located in Beaufort
as 20-1226
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and BEAUFORT COUNTY ASSESSOR
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM D. TRASK, JR., as Trustee of the William D. Trask, Jr. Trust under Article Nine of the William D. Trask Revocable Trust dated February 17, 2000, JAMES HEIDE TRASK, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. 269 Acres Located in Beaufort We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2212
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM D. TRASK, JR., as Trustee of the William D. Trask, Jr. Trust under Article Nine of the William D. Trask Revocable Trust Dated February 17, 2000, JAMES HEIDE TRASK, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BEAUFORT COUNTY ASSESSOR and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
United States of America v. 860 cases more or less of an article of food et al
as 8:2013cv01675
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 860 cases more or less of an article of food, 848 cases more or less of an article of food and 1,3-Dimethylamylamine HCl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Various Articles of Counterfeit Goods
as 5:2012cv00407
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Various Articles of Counterfeit Goods Seized from Martin Cohen
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv00657
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 113/25 POUND BAGS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, EACH BAG LABELED IN PART: and ALL OTHER ARTICLES OF FOOD IN VARIOUS SIZES AND TYPES OF CONTAINERS (EXCLUDING SEALED METAL AND GLASS CONTAINERS) THAT ARE LOCATED ANYWHERE ON THE PREMISES (EXCLUDING THE COOLERS AND FREEZERS) OF CFSD
Claimant: CFSD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States Of America v. All articles of food in various size and type containers (excluding metal and glass containers), including ingredients, in-process, and finished baked goods made from interstate ingredients,
as 7:2009cv00226
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: All articles of food in various size and type containers (excluding metal and glass containers), including ingredients, in-process, and finished baked goods made from interstate ingredients
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?