Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Ghost Cowboy, LLC et al v. Lowery et al
as 2:2024cv03493
Plaintiff:
Ghost Cowboy, LLC and Eva Benefield
Defendant:
Sean Lowery and Lowery Brands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
US v. Rodregus Benefield
as 24-4242
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RODREGUS KEONTAE BENEFIELD
Nelson v. Rockingham County et al
as 4:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Nelson
Defendant:
Rockingham County, Magistrate Carter, Sheriff Samuel Scott Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Hellerstein v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv03345
Plaintiff:
Betty Masch, Connie Hofer, Hilda Lopez and others
Defendant:
Astora Women's Health, Inc., Boston Scientific Corporation, Doe Manufacturers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roanoke Cement Company LLC v. Chesapeake Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00715
Plaintiff:
Roanoke Cement Company LLC
Defendant:
Chesapeake Products, Inc. , Frit, Inc. , Frit Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Todd v. White et al
as 1:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
Levon Todd
Defendant:
Susan White, Mike Slagle, Norma Melton and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
James C. Austin v. Fredreck Schilling
as 15-7445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES C. AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDRECK SCHILLING, MD/Head Medical Director, HAPPY SMITH, Doctor, ELLA DAVIDSON, Registered Nurse and others
Benefield et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29822
Plaintiff:
Karen Benefield and Steve Benefield
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Benefield v. Brad Perritt
as 14-6701
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES E. BENEFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
BRAD PERRITT, Superintendent
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Benefield et al
as 2:2014cv00152
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Jason Lee Benefield and Ashley Nicole Benefield
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
