Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Adam et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Adam, Lisa Butz, Chane Canfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Brace et al v. Westlake Natrium, LLC
as 5:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
John W. Brace and Elizabeth J. Brace
Defendant:
Westlake Natrium, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Blackmon-Brace
as 0:2021cv02734
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Linda Blackmon-Brace
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1703
Uhuru' Obataiye-Allah v. VDOC
as 21-6788
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, HAROLD W. CLARKE, R. MURPHY, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL DUKE, Special Investigator and W. STOVE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UHURU' SEKOU OBATAIYE-ALLAH
Ajani Obataiye v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00877
Defendant:
Rana A. Brace, Keith Dawkins, A.D. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Uhuru Sekou Oataiye-allah and Uhru'sekou Kamara Ajani Obataiye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winning v. Brace
as 2:2017cv03349
Plaintiff:
Richard Winning
Defendant:
Brace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brace v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02118
Plaintiff:
Jean Brace
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brace v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv01633
Petitioner:
Glen Sergio Brace, Jr
Respondent:
Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hanger Inc et al v. Original Bending Brace LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01519
Plaintiff:
Hanger Inc and Hanger National Laboratories LLC
Defendant:
Original Bending Brace LLC and Clarence Ralph Hooper, Jr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
