Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Gomez v. Winslow Custom Homes LLC
as 5:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Garey C Gomez
Defendant:
Winslow Custom Homes LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Schubert v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Allan Schubert
Defendant:
M. Gonzales, S. Thorne, R. D. Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hammons v. Peters et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Linda Gete, C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gale v. Kelly et al
as 5:2023ct03237
Plaintiff:
Brian Gale
Defendant:
Lyn B. Kelly and C. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Keith Dimitri Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Merrick Garland, Mrs. C. S. Peters, Mr. C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dixon v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Dante Dixon
Respondent:
S. Lovett, P. Boch, K. Bigart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bonilla v. C. Gomez et al
as 1:2022cv03171
Plaintiff:
Manuel Bonilla
Defendant:
C. Gomez and Dr. Maria Marrero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Midlo Floors LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Garey C Gomez and Garey C. Gomez
Defendant:
Midlo Floors LLC dba Midlo Floors & Beyond, CityLocal101, LLC and Midlo Floors LLC doing business as Midlo Floors & Beyond
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jesse Simpson v. A. McCabe
as 22-6282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. MCCABE, DAP-C Chief of Psychology, C. GOMEZ, Warden, WOLEVER, Associate Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02138
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
