Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Alan Cady et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01312
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Cady and Theresa A Cady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cady v. Falls et al
as 1:2022cv00199
Petitioner:
Mark Spencer Cady
Defendant:
Jeremy A Falls and Jason S. Miyares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Cady v. Ride-Away Handicap Equipment
as 16-1183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN T. CADY
Defendant - Appellee:
RIDE-AWAY HANDICAP EQUIPMENT CORPORATION and ELECTRONIC MOBILITY CONTROLS, LLC
Third Party Defendant:
JOHN H. CADY
Robert Cooper v. Roderick Sowers
as 15-7579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
RODERICK R. SOWERS, J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner of Correction, BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden of North Branch Corr. Inst. and others
Cady v. Daniels
as 5:2015cv00456
Petitioner:
Brandon David Cady
Respondent:
Dennis Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cady v. Daniels
as 5:2015hc02206
Petitioner:
Brandon David Cady
Respondent:
Dennis Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cady et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06407
Plaintiff:
Charlene M. Cady and Dale L. Cady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maria Baron et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv05858
Plaintiff:
Maria Baron , Rosa Maria Ramirez , Zona Locklear and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cady v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28344
Plaintiff:
Desiree Cady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cady v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv22175
Plaintiff:
Connie Cady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
