Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Darrell Connor v. Covil Corporation
as 19-1015
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, f/k/a Daniel Construction Company, Inc. and COVIL CORPORATION
Defendant:
GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, DANA COMPANIES, LLC, SUCCESSOR-BY-MERGER TO WARNER BRAKE AND CLUTCH COMPANY, INC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC, WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL A. CONNOR, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Charles Franklin Connor, Deceased
Brown v. USA
as 5:2018cv81324
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Franklin Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown v. USA
as 5:2018cv81325
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Franklin Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 84.53 acres of land, more or less, in Calhoun, Marshall, Ritchie, Tyler and Wetzel Counties West Virginia et al
as 1:2018cv00009
Defendant:
Stephen M. Fye and Nancy F. Fye, Daisy Beardshaw, Janice F. Brookover and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
CONNOR v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FRANKLIN CONNOR
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION , BW/IP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
US v. Charles Brown
as 16-7524
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES FRANKLIN BROWN
US v. Charles Brown
as 16-7525
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES FRANKLIN BROWN
Ohlinger v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27984
Plaintiff:
Charles Franklin Ohlinger
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv24763
Plaintiff:
Brenda Jean Lewis and Charles Franklin Lewis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
