Cases 1 - 10 of 26
US v. Charles Smith
as 23-6423
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES HENRY SMITH
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2022cv00357
Petitioner:
CHARLES HENRY SMITH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gooding, III v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 0:2022cv00793
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Gooding, III
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
US Attorney - Social Security Noticing and Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Adams v. Hicks
as 7:2020cv00566
Defendant:
Officer Hicks
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Hicks
as 3:2020cv00700
Defendant:
Officer Hicks
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson et al v. Duncan et al
as 7:2019cv00802
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff's Office, Montgomery County Commonwealth's Attorney Office, Randal J. Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron D. Dickerson and Progressive National Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al
as 5:2017cv03192
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry, Paul Hardison, Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al Do not docket in this case. See new case number 5:17-ct-3192-BO.
as 7:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry, Paul Hardison, Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al
as 5:2017ct03192
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry , Paul Hardison , Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al CASE OPENED IN ERROR. PLEASE SEE CORRECT CASE 5:17-CT-3192-BO.
as 7:2017ct00153
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry, Paul Hardison, Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
