Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Curtis Smith v. John Herring We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-6263
Petitioner / Appellant: CURTIS JOEL SMITH
Respondent / Appellee: JOHN A. HERRING
Smith v. Herring
as 5:2018hc02191
Defendant: John A. Herring
Plaintiff: Curtis Joel Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Herring We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00404
Petitioner: Curtis Joel Smith
Respondent: John A Herring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Wilson
as 1:2016cv01441
Petitioner: Curtis A. Smith
Respondent: Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv21299
Plaintiff: Carol A. Smith and Curtis L. Smith
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2013cv00059
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Petitioner: Curtis Edward Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Nielsen v. Curtis Smith
as 09-1567
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL K. NIELSEN
Defendant - Appellee: CURTIS R. SMITH, CRANDALL CORPORATION, JAN W. ANDERSON and others
Nielsen v. Smith et al
as 3:2007cv03892
Plaintiff: Michael K Nielsen
Defendant: Curtis R Smith and Crandall Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Smith et al v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 8:2007cv01101
Plaintiff: Curtis Lee Smith and Mary E Smith
Defendant: Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BENNETT v. SMITH et al
as 1:2007mc00021
Plaintiff: RANDLE W. BENNETT
Defendant: CURTIS SCOTT SMITH and DONIA TROTTER SMITH
Trustee: GERALD S. SCHAFER
Movant: MICHAEL D. WEST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?