Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Peter Gakuba v. April
as 23-2303
Plaintiff:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant:
APRIL, Customer Service, USPS, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Blackwell v. Unnamed Customer Service Supervisor et al
as 7:2018cv03554
Defendant:
City of Union Utility Department, Unnamed Service Technician and Unnamed Customer Service Supervisor
Plaintiff:
Harold Estes Blackwell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. DIRECTV Customer Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02883
Plaintiff:
Lloyd D. Hale and Marilyn Marie Hale
Defendant:
DIRECTV Customer Services, Inc. , DIRECTV, LLC , AT&T, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Griffin v. Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00632
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Griffin
Defendant:
Macy's Credit and Customer Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Larry D. Reaves v. Criminal Division
as 12-1762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY D. REAVES
Defendant - Appellee:
CRIMINAL DIVISION, Customer Service Services Window
Larry D. Reaves v. Criminal Division
as 12-1763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY D. REAVES
Defendant - Appellee:
CRIMINAL DIVISION, Customer Service Services Window
Larry D. Reaves v. Criminal Division
as 12-1768
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY D. REAVES
Defendant - Appellee:
CRIMINAL DIVISION, Customer Service Service Window
Paul Frizzell v. State of North Carolina
as 12-1554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL FRIZZELL
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, REBECCA THORNE TIN, Mecklenburg County District Court Judge, RICHARD BONNER, Mecklenburg County Superior Court Judge and others
Reaves v. Criminal Division, Customer Service Services Window
as 1:2012cv00383
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Criminal Division, Customer Service Services Window
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Criminal Division Customer Service Services Window
as 1:2012cv00382
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Defendant:
Criminal Division Customer Service Services Window
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
