Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Moorish Science Temple v. US
as 19-7186
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOORISH SCIENCE TEMPLE OF AMERICA, a/k/a Aaron D. Hunter, Ex Rel. Sheik Hunter EL, relator
Belt v. Hunter et al
as 1:2017cv00956
Petitioner:
Tariq Liyuen A Belt
Respondent:
D. Hunter and Piedmont Regional Jail Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gover v. Hunter
as 3:2017cv00571
Plaintiff:
Shawn Gover
Defendant:
Mr. D. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Halter v. Hunter
as 1:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Daniel N. Halter
Defendant:
D. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv02234
Plaintiff:
Patricia D Hunter
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07668
Plaintiff:
Rachel D. Hunter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 5:2013cv00061
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Teri Larocca Insurance Agency, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary H. Harris and Brent D. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
US Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Prestige Capital Advisors, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00431
Plaintiff:
US Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Prestige Capital Advisors, LLC, D2W Capital Management, LLC and Toby D. Hunter
Claimant:
Taylored Business Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6
Hunter v. Astrue
as 7:2010cv00311
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Lorraine D. Hunter
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
