Cases 1 - 10 of 8,393
Putney v. Harford County Government et al
as 1:2024cv01459
Plaintiff:
Kory Putney
Defendant:
Harford County Government, Sheriff Jeffrey R. Gahler and Warden Daniel Galbraith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Steen v. Sonoco Products Company et al
as 4:2024cv03105
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steen
Defendant:
Sonoco Products Company, Board of Directors of Sonoco Products Company, The, Employee Benefits Committee of the Sonoco Retirement & Savings Plan, The and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Mueller v. Butcher
as 1:2024cv00828
Plaintiff:
Kurt D. Mueller
Defendant:
Daniel Butcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
WOODBURY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WOODBURY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Brown v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Lekisha Dee Brown
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Gary McFadden, Reserve Health PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Mueller v. Butcher et al
as 1:2024cv00812
Defendant:
Daniel M. Butcher and Kurt D Mueller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Daniels v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Cornitha Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hurt v. J. Monts et al
as 8:2024cv02975
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mason Hurt
Defendant:
J. Monts and Detective Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
