Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Richardson-Bright v. US Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2022cv00274
Defendant:
Morgan State, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Vinay Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Richardson-Bright and Kathaleen Richardson-Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gabbidon v. Wilson et al
as 1:2019cv00828
Plaintiff:
Paulette Gabbidon and Paulette Hibbert
Defendant:
David R. Wilson, Gina Honaker, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
B. M. v. Wilson, et al
as 1:2019cv00819
Defendant:
The United States of America, David R. Wilson, Lieutenant Workman and others
Plaintiff:
B. M.
Not Yet Classified:
Omar J. Aboulhosn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
C. L. v. Wilson et al
as 1:2019cv00792
Defendant:
Lieutenant Scott Hall, David R. Wilson, Correctional Officer Chelsea Ryder and others
Plaintiff:
C. L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
S. B. v. Wilson et al
as 1:2019cv00773
Defendant:
Randy Keyes, David R. Wilson, The United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
S. B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
C.H. v. Wilson et al
as 5:2019cv00645
Plaintiff:
C.H.
Defendant:
David R. Wilson, The United States of America, Jerrod R. Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Rahim v. Adger et al
as 0:2019cv00609
Plaintiff:
Dawud Rahim and David L. Wilson
Defendant:
Jerry B. Adger, Larry Ray Patton, Jr. and Thomas W. Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Thorton
as 1:2017cv00203
Petitioner:
David Michael Wilson
Respondent:
Cynthia D. Thorton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Thorton
as 1:2017cv00165
Petitioner:
David Michael Wilson
Respondent:
Cynthia D. Thorton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv03223
Petitioner:
Sandra Campbell
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and David R. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
