Cases 1 - 10 of 510
Williams v. White et al
as 5:2024ct03146
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Williams, III
Defendant:
Dr. David White, Department of Adult Correction and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Keurig Dr. Pepper, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Christopher Moore
Defendant:
Keurig Dr. Pepper, Inc. and Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Pacheco v. Markeke et al
as 5:2024ct03140
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Officer Markeke, Sergeant Hall, Lieutenant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bussie v. Sharf
as 5:2024ct03114
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bussie
Defendant:
Dr. Sharf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCALLISTER v. NAPH CARE et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
NAPH CARE, MS. CORRELL, MS. COWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Begeny v. The Helps Education Fund, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Dr. John Begeny
Defendant:
The Helps Education Fund, Inc., William Gibson and Erin Banks
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hodge v. Cook
as 5:2024ct03104
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Hodge
Defendant:
Dr. Patrick Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manno v. McRae et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Dr. Francis A.M. Manno
Defendant:
Dr. Susan McRae, Karen Oppelt, Members of the IACUC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
