Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tipton v. Lane et al
as 3:2021cv00237
Plaintiff:
Shari L. Tipton
Defendant:
Darrell E. Lane, II and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas, Health and Welfare Fund doing business as TeamCare
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Aucker et al v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00543
Plaintiff:
Wayne McCully, Leanne M. Baker, Judy A Hebbard and others
Defendant:
Randy Davis, M.D., RFD Management, LLC, Baltimore Washington Medical Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lane v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv12764
Plaintiff:
Audra E. Lane
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
Barbara E. Lane
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Lane
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lane et al
as 4:2009mc00050
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert E Lane, Wealth Pools International Inc and Recruit For Wealth Inc
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LANE et al
as 1:2009mc00044
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ROBERT E. LANE, WEALTH POOLS INTERNATIONAL, INC., RECRUIT FOR WEALTH, INC. and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lane et al
as 8:2009mc00280
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert E. Lane, Wealth Pools International, Inc., Recruit for Wealth, Inc. and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lane et al
as 1:2009mc00039
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert E. Lane, Wealth Pools International, Inc. and Recruit for Wealth, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
