Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Martin v. Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00648
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Emory Martin, IV
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Emory Peak Wellness, LLC v. Hyper Ice, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv04263
Defendant:
Hyperice IP Subco, LLC and Hyper Ice, Inc
Plaintiff:
Emory Peak Wellness, LLC doing business as Ekrin Athletics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
John Pendarvis v. Alan Wilson
as 24-6654
Defendant:
RHETT HOLDEN, Agent/employee of SLED, JOHN NEALE, Agent/employee of SLED, JASON WELLS, Captain for SLEDs Narcotics division and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN TRENTON PENDARVIS
LLT Management LLC v. Emory et al
as 4:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
LLT Management LLC
Defendant:
Dr. Theresa Swain Emory, Dr. Richard Lawrence Kradin and Dr. John Coulter Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Roberts, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2024cv01720
Plaintiff:
Emory W. Roberts, Jr.
Defendant:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dacha v. Moody, et al
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Dacha
Defendant:
Shelby Moody, Emory Sydney, Paris Veillard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Doe v. Emory and Henry College
as 1:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Emory and Henry College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. USA - 2255
as 8:2023cv01860
Petitioner:
James Emory Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Emory v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Wanda Emory
Defendant:
Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company and Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
