Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jose Lara-Sanches v. Todd Blanche
as 26-2231
Petitioner:
JOSE FERNANDO LARA-SANCHES
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02945
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02878
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03430
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03430
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 6:2026cv03509
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Valdes v. University of Maryland, College Park et al
as 8:2026cv03159
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Fernando Valdes and outlier.mp
Defendant:
University of Maryland, College Park and Board of Regents of the University System of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bea Equal access to public facilities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02485
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
