Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Dilwood et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03407
Plaintiff: Phillip Jonathan Thomas, Sally White, Roberta Hassman and others
Defendant: Tyco Fire Products LP, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., National Foam Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2110
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK, UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States of America v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2110
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK, UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee - Appellee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin Worldwide Moving, N.V
as 17-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL KURT BUNK
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL DANIEL HEUSER and UNITED STATES EX REL RAY AMMONS
Intervenor/Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., VIKTORIA INTERNATIONAL SPEDITION, GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING GMBH and others
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ITO MOBEL TRANSPORT GMBH and others
Garnishee - Appellee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., Belcrownlaan 23 Antwerp 2100 Belgium Government Logistics, N.V.
Louis Chapman v. Bullock We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-6354
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS ROY CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellee: BULLOCK, Correctional Officer, Female, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally, D. NEWCOMER, Captain, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally, JOHN BENDRICK, Sergeant, Investigator, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally and others
Gosselin et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv15724
Plaintiff: Gloria Gosselin and Paul Gosselin
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Government Logistics N.V.
as 15-1207
Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL. KURT BUNK AND RAY AMMONS and UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER
Defendant - Appellee: GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V., MARC SMET and GOSSELIN WORLD WIDE MOVING, N.V.
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ANDREAS CHRIST SPEDITION & MOBELTRANSPORT GMBH and others
US ex rel. Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin World Wide Moving We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1088
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES EX REL. KURT BUNK AND RAY AMMONS
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES EX REL. DANIEL HEUSER
Defendant - Appellee: GOSSELIN WORLDWIDE MOVING, N.V., GOSSELIN GROUP N.V., GOVERNMENT LOGISTICS N.V. and others
Defendant: BIRKART GLOBISTICS GMBH & CO. LOGISTIK UND SERVICE KG, THE PASHA GROUP, ANDREAS CHRIST SPEDITION & MOBELTRANSPORT GMBH and others
:
Chapman v. Bullock et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00463
Plaintiff: Louis Roy Chapman
Defendant: Bullock, D. Newcomer, John Bendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gosselin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00742
Plaintiff: Kelly Gosselin
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?