Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rose Duru v. President Trump Administration
as 19-2134
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Marietta, Georgia, H&R BLOCK BAILEY'S CROSSROADS CENTER, DAVID R. CLOUSTON, Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Duru v. President Trump Administration et al
as 1:2019cv00874
Defendant:
U.S. Court of Appeals, Nathalia Cibolti, Randall A. Constantine and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Adanma Duru
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GADDY v. H&R BLOCK, INC., et al
as 1:2012cv00052
Defendant:
H&R BLOCK, INC., H&R BLOCK SERVICES, INC., HRB TAX GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE M. GADDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murchio et al v. H&R Block, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00063
Plaintiff:
Maggie Murchio and Charles Gasque
Defendant:
H&R Block, Inc., H&R Block Services, Inc., HRB Tax Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
H&R Block Eastern Enterprises, v. Sarah Raskin
as 08-2162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
H&R BLOCK EASTERN ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
SARAH BLOOM RASKIN, In her official capacity as Commissioner of the Division of Financial Regulation of the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation
H&R Block Eastern Enterprises, v. Sarah Raskin
as 08-2163
Plaintiff - Appellee:
H&R BLOCK EASTERN ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
SARAH BLOOM RASKIN, In her official capacity as Commissioner of the Division of Financial Regulation of the Maryland Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation
H&R Block Eastern Enterprises Inc v. Coleman
as 6:2008cv00360
Plaintiff:
H&R Block Eastern Enterprises Inc and H&R Block Eastern Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
Randy Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
H&R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc. v. Turnbaugh
as 1:2007cv01822
Plaintiff:
H&R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Charles W. Turnbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
