Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Williams v. Lindsay
as 5:2024ct03025
Plaintiff:
Harold Lee Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Corey Lindsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Core Communications, Inc. v. Verizon Maryland, Inc.
as 12-2572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON MARYLAND, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
MARYLAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, STEVEN B. LARSEN, In His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Maryland Public Service Commission, HAROLD D. WILLIAMS, In His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Maryland Public Service Commission and others
WILLIAMS v. KELLER
as 1:2011cv00319
Petitioner:
HAROLD L. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Verizon Maryland, Incorporated v. Core Communications, Incorpora
as 09-1839
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VERIZON MARYLAND, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
CORE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - None:
MARYLAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, STEVEN B. LARSEN, In His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Maryland Public Service Commission, HAROLD D. WILLIAMS, In his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Maryland Public Service Commission and others
Baltimore Gas and Electric et al v Busch, et al
as 1:2008cv00565
Plaintiff:
Baltimore Gas and Electric, Baltimore Gas and Electric, Baltimore Gas and Electric and others
Defendant:
Michael E. Busch, Thomas V. Mike Miller, Jr., Martin J. O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Core Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00503
Plaintiff:
Verizon Maryland Inc., Verizon Maryland Inc. and Verizon Maryland Inc.
Defendant:
Core Communications, Inc., Maryland Public Service Commission, Steven B. Larsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Williams v. Astrue
as 3:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Harold Edwin Williams
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
