Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Randolph Johnson v. Labravia Jenkins
as 21-6191
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HARDIMAN, In Public and Private Capacity, LABRAVIA J. JENKINS, in Public and Private Capacity, PAUL W. HIGGS, In Public and Private Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDOLPH WAKEEM JOHNSON
Johnson v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2020cv01421
Defendant:
Micheal Hardiman, Labravia J. Jenkins, David P. Decatur and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Wakeem Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardiman v. USA
as 4:2020cv03853
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thurston Jay Hardiman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Thurston Hardiman
as 20-4512
Defendant / Appellant:
THURSTON JAY HARDIMAN, a/k/a Thirst
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Lance Hardiman
as 19-4407
Defendant / Appellant:
LANCE HARDIMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hardiman v. Florence Asst Public Defender's Office
as 4:2018cv02669
Defendant:
Florence Asst Public Defender's Office
Plaintiff:
Lance Hardiman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardiman v. Florence Asst Public Defender's Office
as 4:2018cv02469
Defendant:
Florence Asst Public Defender's Office
Plaintiff:
Lance Hardiman and Leroy Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
