Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Michael Moshoures v. City of North Myrtle Beach
as 24-1293
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOSHOURES
Defendant:
CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, MARILYN HATLEY, in her official capacity as Mayor of the City of North Myrtle Beach and DANA CROWELL, in her official capacity as Chief of the North Myrtle Beach Department of Public Safety
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff:
KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
Lester v. Ojo et al
as 5:2023ct03363
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
A. Odu, N. Harris, J. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lentz v. Campbell et al
as 5:2023ct03078
Plaintiff:
Shelby Reid Lentz
Defendant:
Travon Campbell, Aisha Cherry, Hunter Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatley v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Martriana Hatley
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Cobb v. Haug et al
as 7:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
Raymond Michael Cobb
Defendant:
Superintendant Hoag, Lisa Ferguson, Lt. Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cureton v. Gray et al
as 5:2022ct03329
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton, Jr.
Defendant:
John R. Gray, Mark Flemmings, Monica Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley Corbett, Jr. v. James Candelario
as 22-6894
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HENRY CANDELARIO, CURTIS MURRAY, JAMIE EMMANUEL HOLMES and others
Moshoures v. North Myrtle Beach, City of et al
as 4:2022cv02123
Plaintiff:
Michael Moshoures
Defendant:
North Myrtle Beach, City of, Marilyn Hatley and Tommy Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Streeter v. King et al
as 5:2021ct03385
Plaintiff:
Faith Sherrie Streeter
Defendant:
Larry C. King, Nancy R. Hatley and Melyen C. Barahand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
