Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Robert Anderson, Jr. v. Keith Arnold
as 26-6416
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANTHONY ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant:
KEITH ARNOLD, MARVIN METZ, Lieutenant, RONALD STOTLER, Chief of Security and others
Acevedo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv13462
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Acevedo, Angela N. Adams, John Adams and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
Aguirre v. THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv12159
Plaintiff:
Jaime Aguirre, Julio Ortiz, Raymond Roby and others
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bennett v. USA - 2255
as 1:2025cv02660
Petitioner:
James Bennett
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
K. B. v. United States of America et al
as 1:2025cv00249
Plaintiff:
K. B.
Defendant:
United States of America and Corrections Officer James Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bennett v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
James Bennett
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Pamela Bennett v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 21-2352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAMELA BENNETT and JAMES BENNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and DOES 1-15
Bennett et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 3:2020cv00244
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
James Bennett and Pamela Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Waller, Jr. v. Frank Perry
as 15-7657
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BENNETT WALLER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK PERRY
WALLER v. PERRY
as 1:2014cv00763
Petitioner:
JAMES BENNETT WALLER, JR.
Respondent:
FRANK PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
