Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Knight et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04202
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Knight, ZACHARY HUEY, BRYAN HUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pinkerman et al v. Cabell County Commission et al
as 3:2021cv00579
Counter Defendant:
Michael L. Pinkerman, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Laura J. Pinkerman
Defendant:
Cabell County Commission, Cabell County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Charles Zerkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinkerman et al v. Cabell County Commission et al
as 3:2021cv00580
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Pinkerman, Michael L. Pinkerman, Sr., Laura J. Pinkerman and others
Defendant:
Cabell County Commission, Cabell County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Charles Zerkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 5:2021cv00089
Plaintiff:
James Johnston
Defendant:
Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated, Cook Medical, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marsh et al v. Johnstone et al
as 5:2021cv00868
Defendant:
James Johnstone and PV Holdings, LLC doing business as Budget Rentals
Plaintiff:
Deborah Marsh and Charles Marsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parker et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03377
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hoskinson-Jordan, Jimmy Turner, Marvin Parker and others
Defendant:
Tyco Fire Products LP, Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PrideStaff, Inc. v. BMOC Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00426
Plaintiff:
PrideStaff, Inc.
Defendant:
BMOC Services, Inc. , James Johnston and Janine Calcote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheppard v. Revell et al
as 5:2009ct03044
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Sheppard
Defendant:
Sara Revell, Karen Bernardo, Greg Norton and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
