Cases 1 - 10 of 2,240
Londell Alston v. City of Rock Hill
as 24-6594
Plaintiff:
LONDELL LASHUN ALSTON
Defendant:
CITY OF ROCK HILL, COUNTY OF YORK, ROCK HIL POLICE DEPARTMENT JOHN DOE #1 and others
Baird v. Sharp et al
as 0:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Dewight Sheldon Baird
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Sharp, Sergeant T. Session and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Albert Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution
as 24-6557
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HUDGINS, Sergeant, MOTLEY, Correctional Officer and others
Wilson v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01660
Plaintiff:
Demiqou Wilson
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Strom Law Firm et al
as 3:2024cv03363
Plaintiff:
Samuel T. Wiggins
Defendant:
Strom Law Firm, Pete Strom, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kelly v. Milam et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Brent Tyler Kelly
Defendant:
J. L. Milam, Daniel P. White, A. W. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Albert Anderson v. McMillian
as 24-6495
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
MCMILLIAN, Medical Provider, ERIC DYE, Warden, JEFFREY DUNCAN, Assistant Warden and others
Hehl v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Hehl
Defendant:
Belk, Inc. and John Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
