Cases 1 - 10 of 298
Bowman v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00475
Defendant:
B. Steffey, Johnny Hall, Jordan Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lowel Bowman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Leu et al
as 2:2024cv00430
Defendant:
Jane Doe 4, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Hosea Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Zeno v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00573
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Williams, Larry Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Zeno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. JAIYEOBA et al
as 1:2024cv00731
Defendant:
UNKNOWN SERGENT, L.S. GARRISON, TAIWO JAIYEOBA and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00428
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #4, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Eugene Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Varner v. Leu et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Defendant:
Warden Leu, Captain Rosencrance, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Varner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Wilson v. Supervising Officer, et al
as 1:2024cv01660
Defendant:
Creally CO II, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Demiqou Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Londell Alston v. City of Rock Hill
as 24-6594
Defendant:
COUNTY OF YORK, RHPD JOHN DOE #3, ROCK HIL POLICE DEPARTMENT JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
LONDELL LASHUN ALSTON
Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01026
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 8, John Doe 7 and others
Plaintiff:
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Ibach v. Charleston County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv02573
Plaintiff:
Trevor Ibach
Defendant:
Charleston County Sheriffs Office, Kristen Graziano, Nicholas Vecchione and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
