Cases 1 - 10 of 43
John Smith v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv07040
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Baldomero et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01952
Plaintiff:
Villareal Baldomero, James Wagenbrenner, Gary Palmerson and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Talbott v. Smith
as 1:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Talbott
Defendant:
John Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
SMITH v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
John Smith v. Towson University
as 22-2319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWSON UNIVERSITY
Smith v. Towson University
as 1:2022cv02998
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Towson University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. Town of Mount Pleasnt et al
as 2:2022cv02365
Plaintiff:
Joe Doe
Defendant:
Town of Mount Pleasnt, Officer Shawn Fillian and Officers Jane and John Smith 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
El v. Horowitz et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
My'Ka El
Defendant:
Michael E Horowitz, US Department of Justice, Gretchen C.F. Shappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. DIY Pole Barns & Supplies, Inc.
as 8:2021cv02665
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
DIY Pole Barns & Supplies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Christin et al
as 2:2021cv02045
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
James Larue Christin and Evans Delivery Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
