Cases 1 - 10 of 12
In re: Antolin Garcia-Manzanares
as 24-135
Petitioner:
In re: ANTOLIN GARCIA-MANZANARES, a/k/a Jose Gomez-Martinez
Gomez v. Marylandlivecrawfish, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv03233
Plaintiff:
Jose Gomez
Defendant:
Marylandlivecrawfish, LLC doing business as Oc & Crab Seafood Restaurant, Thuan Cao Nguyen and Tracy Hoang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gomez-Rocha v. King
as 5:2023hc02026
Petitioner:
Jose Gomez-Rocha
Respondent:
Malinda L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gutierrez et al v. Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc.
as 7:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Augusto Gutierrez, Walter Artica, Gilberto Andrade and others
Defendant:
Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Zelaya et al v. House of Foong Lin et al
as 8:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Anibal Zelaya and Jose Gomez
Defendant:
House of Foong Lin, CFK, LLC and Fu K. Cheung
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Turcios et al v. Diverse Masonry Corporation
as 1:2016cv01331
Plaintiff:
Roger Turcios , Jose Gomez , Luis Garcia and others
Defendant:
Diverse Masonry Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baldovinos et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14595
Plaintiff:
Mary Baldovinos and Jose Gomez Baldovinos
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valdivia et al v. Pascoe
as 8:2015cv00631
Plaintiff:
Alberto Valdivia and Maria Jose Gomez Moreno
Defendant:
Lyndsay Helene Pascoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv13013
Plaintiff:
Esmeralda R. Gomez and Jose Gomez
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOMEZ v. AQUA DESIGNS, INC.
as 1:2010cv00577
Plaintiff:
JOSE GOMEZ
Defendant:
AQUA DESIGNS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
