Cases 1 - 10 of 24,504
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Darrell Goss v. Shane Jackson
as 24-6563
Petitioner:
DARRELL L. GOSS
Respondent:
WARDEN SHANE D. JACKSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lancaster v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024ct03150
Plaintiff:
Milton E. Lancaster
Defendant:
Mashell L. Wilson, Timothy L. Lewis, Mr. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prince v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02111
Petitioner:
Reginald L. Prince
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tolbert v. McFadden et al
as 3:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Tolbert
Defendant:
Gary L. McFadden, Elisa Chinn-Gary and Donald Cureton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walton v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv01681
Plaintiff:
Rwayne M. Walton
Defendant:
Angela L. Washington, Terrance Deanes and Suzanne Rouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lloyd et al v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD et al
as 8:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Samantha Lloyd and Douglas Lloyd
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD, Director Corenne D Labbe, Acting Director Gregory K Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Fuller v. Spartanburg County et al
as 6:2024cv03449
Plaintiff:
Deandre L Fuller
Defendant:
Spartanburg County and Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Allen v. Allen et al
as 5:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Kathy R. Allen
Defendant:
Arthur L. Allen, Anthony A. Klish, State Employees Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
