Cases 1 - 10 of 1,892
Moore v. Gilley
as 7:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
Terrance Lamont Moore
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCord v. USA
as 3:2024cv00448
Petitioner:
Lamont E. McCord
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. Raymond Seward
as 24-4302
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RAYMOND LAMONT SEWARD
Dingle v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv01657
Petitioner:
Donte Lamont Dingle
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diggs v. Johnson et al
as 7:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamont Diggs
Defendant:
Craig Johnson and Sgt. E.C. Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Ricky Congleton
as 24-6500
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RICKY LAMONT CONGLETON
Anthony Gardner, Jr. v. Kenyatta Momon
as 24-1424
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LAMONT GARDNER, JR.
Defendant:
KENYATTA MOMON, in his individual and official capacity as a member of the Fairfax County Police Department, THOMAS ARMEL, in his individual and official capacity as a member of the Fairfax County Police Department and COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
Jones v. Queen Anne's County, Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01333
Plaintiff:
Donald Jones
Defendant:
Queen Anne's County, Maryland, Warden/Director Lamonte Cooke, Sgt. Daniel Andrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
John Wright v. Granville County
as 24-1389
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. WRIGHT, Administrator of the Estate of Chad E. Price
Defendant:
GRANVILLE COUNTY, SHERIFF BRINDELL B. WILKINS, JR., CHARLES ROYSTER NOBLIN, JR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
