Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Killings et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00398
Defendant: 3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Lemuel Killings, Jr, James Harper, Raymond Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Jones v. Tabor
as 7:2023cv00609
Plaintiff: Reginald Lamont Jones
Defendant: C/O Sheena Tabor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Tabe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00580
Plaintiff: Reginald Lamont Jones
Defendant: WVR Jail, Wellpath's Health Services Director, C/O S. Tabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02096
Petitioner: Daryl Lamont Jones
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Daryl Jones v. Christopher Daniels
as 21-7549
Petitioner / Appellant: DARYL LAMONT JONES
Respondent / Appellee: CHRISTOPHER DANIELS, Commonwealth District Attorney
Jones v. Daniels
as 2:2021cv00330
Petitioner: Daryl Lamont Jones
Respondent: Christopher Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Saul
as 1:2021cv01168
Plaintiff: Michael Lamont Jones
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul and SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
US v. Thomas Jones
as 20-7568
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS LAMONT JONES
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY et al
as 1:2020cv00851
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and KATIE POOLE
Plaintiff: ANTONIO LAMONT JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Commissioner Andrew Saul of the Social Security Administration
as 7:2020cv00456
Plaintiff: Reginald Lamont Jones
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?