Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jay Folse v. John McCuskey, Jr.
as 24-1285
Plaintiff:
JAY FOLSE
Defendant:
JOHN MCCUSKEY, JR., in his official and individual capacities, G. RUSSELL ROLLYSON, JR., in his official and individual capacities and MICHELLE JONES
Folse v. McCuskey et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
John McCuskey, Jr., G. Russell Rollyson, Jr. and Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2020cv02561
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Plaintiff:
Teresita Michelle Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burral v. Jones et al
as 1:2019cv02621
Defendant:
Brockbridge Correctional Facility, Jessup, Maryland, Unnamed members of the supervisory team, John Doe Warden #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis William Burral and Lewis Burral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Peterson, et al. v. Universal Medical Equipment & Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00596
Defendant:
Universal Medical Equipment & Resources, Inc. and Eyibio Adah
Plaintiff:
Andre Peterson , Michelle Jones and John Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. Webb et al
as 8:2016cv00034
Plaintiff:
Nicholas White
Defendant:
Wayne Webb, Ricky Foxwell and Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv04136
Plaintiff:
Michelle Jones and Derek W. Jones
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv19838
Plaintiff:
Michelle Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv15074
Plaintiff:
Michelle Jones
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
