Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Knight et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04202
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Knight, ZACHARY HUEY, BRYAN HUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 7:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Blankenship, T. Norvell, C.A. Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartley v. Collins et al
as 7:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Michael Bartley
Defendant:
Adam Collins, Lieutenant Horn, Sergeant Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Norvell, C.A. Dye, Lt. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Broadstone Security LLC, et al
as 1:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
Reginald Norvell Robinson
Defendant:
Broadstone Security LLC doing business as Nova Armory, Shawn G. Poulin and Ofc. M. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weatherspoon v. USA
as 2:2022cv00128
Petitioner:
Stevie Norvell Weatherspoon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Allen v. Norvell et al
as 7:2021cv00213
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, T. Lowe, A.T. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prentice v. Norvell
as 5:2021hc02081
Petitioner:
Steven Dixon Prentice
Respondent:
Warden Norvell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ewing, III v. United States of America et al
as 8:2021cv00442
Plaintiff:
Norvell Ewing, III
Defendant:
Nierica A. Brooks and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672
Preston v. DC Tours & Transportation et al
as 8:2020cv03103
Defendant:
Norvel F. Wood and DC Tours & Transportation
Plaintiff:
Parris A. Preston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
