Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hardin v. Roach et al
as 5:2023ct03070
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Hardin
Defendant:
Officer Roach, Superintendent Albright, Superintendent Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tinker v. Eastern Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Lahvon Lee Tinker
Defendant:
Eastern Correctional Institution, Warden Walter West, Captain Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
William Huggins v. Officer Roach
as 16-7382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. HUGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER ROACH, DREW STANLEY and DENNIS ROWLAND
Huggins v. Roach et al
as 5:2015ct03002
Plaintiff:
William Michael Huggins
Defendant:
Officer Roach, Drew Stanley and Dennis Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Town of Chatham, Virginia et al
as 4:2012cv00033
Defendant:
Chatham, Va Police Department, Attorney Larry Gott, Commonwealth Atty David Grimes and others
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merle Rutledge, Jr. v. Officer Roach
as 10-2310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERLE T. RUTLEDGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER ROACH OF THE CHATHAM, VA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant:
TOWN OF CHATHAM, VIRGINIA, CHATHAM, VA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF MARTIN WRIGHT OF THE CHATHAM, VA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Rutledge v. Town of Chatham, Virginia et al
as 4:2010cv00054
Defendant:
Chatham, Va Police Department, Officer Roach of the Chatham, Va Police Department, Town of Chatham, Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rutledge v. Town of Chatham, Virginia et al
as 4:2010cv00035
Defendant:
Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, Chatham, Va Police Department, Chief Marvin Wright of the Chatham, Va Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
