Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Reaves v. Williamson et al
as 7:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Freddie Williamson, Melissa Thompson, Everette Teal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Vernon Earle v. Shreves
as 19-6655
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. BRECKON, Assistance Warden of Operations, MR. GONOUNDY, [SIA] Special Investigative Agent, SHREVES, C/O and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VERNON NORMAN EARLE
Pulice v. Crown Cork & Seal USA et al
as 5:2018cv00153
Defendant:
Crown Holdings, Inc. and Crown Cork & Seal USA
Plaintiff:
Paul Pulice
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Boudreaux et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00724
Plaintiff:
Carmen Boudreaux and Ronald Pulice
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earle v. Shreves et al
as 2:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Vernon Norman Earle
Defendant:
Shreves, J. Rivera, R. Domas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Earle v. Shreves et al
as 5:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
Vernon Norman Earle
Defendant:
Shreves, J. Rivera, R. Domas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vitrano v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Vitrano
Defendant:
Charles Samuels , Jr., J.F. Caraway, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vitrano v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Thomas Phillip Vitrano
Defendant:
Charles Samuels , Jr., J.F. Caraway, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hollins v. Cross et al
as 1:2009cv00075
Plaintiff:
Michael Hollins
Defendant:
James N Cross, C. Mihlo, C. Pulice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bender v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bender
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary Hazelton, Warden's Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
