Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Smith v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv03202
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Marcialena Brown v. Centerra-Savannah River Site
as 20-1706
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY STEVENSON, CENTERRA-SAVANNAH RIVER SITE and RAYMOND SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCIALENA TREMBLE BROWN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Parker et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03377
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hoskinson-Jordan, Jimmy Turner, Marvin Parker and others
Defendant:
Tyco Fire Products LP, Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Popish et al
as 5:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Raymond Smith
Defendant:
Eric Popish and City Of Weirton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Sahara Cafe O.C., Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01299
Defendant:
J.R. Whitmeyer and Sahara Cafe O.C., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raymond Smith and Mary Ann Wright
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
US v. Leslie Okyere
as 16-4375
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LESLIE OKYERE, a/k/a Raymond Smith
Smith et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv06440
Plaintiff:
Judith L. Smith and Raymond Smith
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31443
Plaintiff:
Rida Smith and Raymond Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv24582
Plaintiff:
Virginia Smith and Raymond Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
