Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tweed et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04180
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Carrier Fire & Security Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Tweed, Angela Martin, James Phillip Mikles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Runge v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05391
Plaintiff:
Anita Runge
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Runge et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2014cv28200
Plaintiff:
Mary Runge and Charles W. Runge
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QBE Insurance Corporation v. Rung LLC et al
as 9:2014cv03633
Plaintiff:
QBE Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Rung LLC, Country Inns & Suites By Carlson Inc, Carlson Hotels Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2014cv01972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Yuk Tsang v. Craig Apker
as 14-6760
Petitioner - Appellant:
YUK RUNG TSANG
Respondent - Appellee:
CRAIG APKER, Warden
Runge v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv15652
Plaintiff:
Kathy Runge
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Runge v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25108
Plaintiff:
Patricia Runge
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tsang v. Apker
as 5:2013hc02183
Petitioner:
Yuk Rung Tsang
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jon Runge v. Tom Barton
as 09-2251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JON J. RUNGE
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM BARTON, President Greenville Technical College, JANIE REID, Dean of Financial Aid Greenville Technical College, P. GEORGE BENSON, President College of Charleston and others
Defendant - None:
SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF, MARK SANFORD, Governor The State of South Carolina and GARRISON WALTERS, Executive Director South Carolina Commission on Higher Education
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
