Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Boyd v. Municipality of Robersonville et al
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
S. Boyd
Defendant:
Municipality of Robersonville, Leon Bonner, Cynthia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Boyd v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2018cv03086
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
David S Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyd v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jeanette S. Boyd
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Boyd v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03245
Plaintiff:
Rebecca S. Boyd
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01808
Plaintiff:
Linda S. Boyd
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01048
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Boyd et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv11162
Plaintiff:
Latasha S. Boyd and Steven L. Boyd
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips et al v. USDA Forest Service et al
as 1:2011cv00152
Defendant:
USDA Forest Service , Terri Hope Dugas , Irene W. Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Frank W. Phillips, Jr. , Vivien Phillips , Mitchell Lumber Company, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Terri Hope Dugas and Irene W. Cain
Counter_defendant:
Roger Ellis Ayers, Jr. , Ruffin Phillips Ayers , Mitchell Lumber Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reid v. Eagles et al
as 5:2010ct03163
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Catherine C. Eagles, R. Stuart Albright, Lindsey R. Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
