Cases 1 - 10 of 664
Saunders v. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
as 3:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Saunders
Defendant:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Crayton et al v. 3M Company Inc et al
as 2:2024cv07058
Plaintiff:
Tonya Mitchell, Tanya Puryear, Eva Crayton and others
Defendant:
3M Company Inc, Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc and Daikin America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Saunders v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00679
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Quantel O. Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
John Shade, III v. US
as 24-7102
Defendant:
C. DAY, Unit Manager FCI McDowell, C. MARUKA, Former Warden FCI McDowell, FRED SAUNDERS, Former Unit Manager FCI McDowell and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. SHADE, III
Saunders v. Clarke
as 7:2024cv00796
Petitioner:
Edward Germaine Saunders
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gregory Rhodes et al v. The 3m Company et al.
as 2:2024cv05685
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Roberts, Luis Rivera, Steven Robichaud and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
US v. Tyrell Saunders
as 24-6902
Defendant:
TYRELL KEONI SAUNDERS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00634
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hugo Barrera et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04855
Defendant:
3M Company, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, EIDP Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Grochowski, Richard Dodson, Tyson Bruder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
