Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Geneva Enterprises, LLC et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Geneva Enterprises, LLC and AV Automotive, LLC
Defendant:
Aaron Chavez, Alex Guevara, Ana Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Shibumi Shade, Inc. v. Beach Shade LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
Shibumi Shade, Inc.
Defendant:
Beach Shade LLC and Matthew Finneran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Shade v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
John William Shade, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice, Jason Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luxottica Group S.p.A, et al v. Marsalle, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03242
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, and Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
MARSALLE, INC. and Marsalle, Inc. a New York corporation doing business as City Shades by NYS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Viola et al v. The City of Morgantown
as 1:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Brandon Viola, Matthew Solomon, Chad Reyes and others
Counter Defendant:
Kenneth Murphey, Joshua Frantz, Austin Bittner and others
Defendant:
The City of Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
US v. Kewan Shade
as 22-4384
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEWAN MARQUIS SHADE
US v. Rashaad Washington
as 22-4058
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RASHAAD SHADEE WASHINGTON
Shade v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00043
Petitioner:
John W. Shade, III
Defendant:
Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carolina Covertech, Inc. v. ALP, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02882
Plaintiff:
Carolina Covertech, Inc.
Defendant:
ALP, Inc. doing business as ALP Lockdown Shades doing business as ALP Sewing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
