Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Goodwin v. Bisignano
as 7:2026cv00299
Plaintiff:
Stacy Goodwin
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Garansnay v. Doe #1 et al
as 7:2026cv00541
Plaintiff:
Xavier Ryan Garansnay
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Whitt et al
as 7:2026cv00526
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Robert Whitt, Manager of Big Stone, VA U.S. Postal Service, U.S. Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunberg v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2026cv02391
Plaintiff:
Stacy Nunberg
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Arkema, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harley v. LeFever
as 1:2026cv00386
Petitioner:
Staci Harley
Respondent:
Warden M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. Watson et al
as 7:2026cv00440
Plaintiff:
Joseph Micheal Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
D. Watson, Cooke, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
