Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00671
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1661
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Huffman v. Clear et al
as 7:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Steve Clear, Major Parks, Captain Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Duffield Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Duffield Jail, Chaplain R. Adams, Lt. R. Templeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Templeton v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 7:2023cv04495
Plaintiff:
Hannah C Templeton
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Jonathan Babb v. Cpt. Haynes
as 23-6523
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE BABB
Defendant / Appellee:
CPT. HAYNES, LT. TEMPLETON, LT. HOUNSHELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Boron Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2022mc00264
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Boron Capital, LLC, BC Holdings 2017, LLC, United BNB Fund 2018, LLC and others
Chris Templeton v. Bishop of Charleston
as 22-1166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS TEMPLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
THE BISHOP OF CHARLESTON, a Corporation Sole
Defendant:
ROBERT GUGLIEMONE, The Bishop Of Charleston, in his official capacity, Successor in interest to and on behalf of Ernest Unterkeoffler,former Bishop of Charleston, sued individually in his official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
