Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
FRANKLIN v. TOWN OF NORWOOD et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SCOTT FRANKLIN
Defendant: TOWN OF NORWOOD, TRENTEN JAMAR WEATHERS, JOHNATHAN LEE FURR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huffman v. USA
as 3:2023cv00903
Petitioner: Timothy Scott Huffman
Respondent: USA
Interested Party: USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McCullough v. Whitesides et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv03406
Plaintiff: Timothy Scott McCullough
Defendant: John Brad Whitesides and Lancaster Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
US v. Timothy Wenk
as 23-4044
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: TIMOTHY SCOTT WENK, a/k/a Timothy Scott, a/k/a Tim Scott
RANDLEMAN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SCOTT RANDLEMAN
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Payne et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff: Lloyd Lynn Payne, John Jeffery Heineck, James Marshall Strock and others
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
US v. Timothy Pennington
as 22-4725
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: TIMOTHY SCOTT PENNINGTON
Wilde v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 6:2022cv00047
Plaintiff: Timothy Scott Wilde
Defendant: Commissioner Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
US v. Timothy Hardin
as 22-4432
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: TIMOTHY SCOTT HARDIN
US v. Timothy Huffman
as 21-4665
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: TIMOTHY SCOTT HUFFMAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?