Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Harron v. USA
as 2:2022cv00034
Petitioner: Timothy Mark Harron
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Osburn v. State of West Virginia
as 3:2019cv00126
Respondent: State of West Virginia
Petitioner: Timothy Mark Osburn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parmer v. USA
as 4:2016cv00120
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Timothy Mark Parmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In Re: Timothy Parmer
as 16-850
Movant: In re: TIMOTHY MARK PARMER
:
Pro-Concepts, LLC v. Resh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00573
Plaintiff: Pro-Concepts, LLC
Defendant: Timothy Mark Resh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
US v. Timothy Parmer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-6501
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TIMOTHY MARK PARMER
Parmer v. USA
as 4:2011cv00042
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Timothy Mark Parmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Circle T. Pipeline, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00018
Defendant: Timothy Mark Anders, Circle T. Pipeline, Inc. and Larry D Sturgill
Plaintiff: Branch Banking and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Arvilla Pipeline Construction Co., Inc. v. Equitable Gathering, LLC, et al
as 6:2010cv01085
Plaintiff: Arvilla Pipeline Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant: Equitable Gathering, LLC , Timothy Mark Anders , Red Ridge Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Davis et al v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 0:2009cv02861
Plaintiff: Timothy Mark Davis and Alison M Davis
Defendant: AW Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval Inc, American Standard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?